Sure, we can start with the red flags.
The first red flag: If you don't get it, it does not mean it is a joke.
The second red flag: You really did not study the project. Token holder did not invest in the space tourism neither it has been said anywhere. Psyche itself will invest in space tourism.
The third red flag: I am sure, you would have done your research before calling it an anonymous team. During the sale, the whole team details with their social links were on the website. Now it does not require there anymore so it has been moved. However, you can still find the team if you know how to, have you done the research?
The fourth red flag: If you have a serious concern with SEC and FAT or other regulatory frameworks, you wouldn't be here. The basic concept of crypto is P2P, I hope you are done googling that minimum.
Please don't take it wrongly, the answers are in the same tone as you started.
Positive criticism is always welcome but if you do about any project, make sure you have studied deeply and understand the concept. If you have any question, you are more than welcome to ask and we are more than happy to answer them.
Ok, there are so many red flags with in this i don't know where to start from.
Let's start with this:
But that's not all![/b]
Psyche Coin is about to operate in an ultra-modern society, and that is why Psyche will be the first coin to focus on space tourism and the futuristic plan. Named after the famous asteroid Psyche 16, which will be at the forefront of space mining, Psyche Coin will invest in space mining startups. It is one of the most famous human debates to explore and exploit the benefits of space to fulfill the human dream. Since we already went through the benefits and how Psyche will transform the future and utilize it for the common good, let's see what the prices are.
I don't get this. Is this a joke? We are supposed to trust anonymous team that might have just sold unregistered securities to invest their money to space tourism and somehow this would benefit token holders? And somehow this fiat money traffic would happen under the radar of SEC, FATF and other regulatory framework?
And Anonymous balances with supposed stable coins sounds like a regulatory AML nightmare.