The truth is, you only are interesting accusatin and reputation topic from Adkinsbet, trying to give them a bad name. Since you work for Sportsbet.io, it is very relevant. To be sure that Sportsbet.io, together with Bitcasino.io, will now also receive the necessary attention

You can be sure about that.
That is going to be interesting. As for your position at Sportsbet.io, the posts below are definitely posted by you for fun? There are dozens in which you give an update about the field of participants.
I'll give you the archived links to where I sourced the data: they were compiled from Sportsbet.io's public list back when the event was takking place, but my question is what this has to do with AdkinsBet.
Thanks to all the random Sportsbet.io attention, I'm able to quote one of the posts where I admonish their ToS in the exact same way I admonish
AdkinsBet's Terms and Conditions, something that is relevant to this thread:
Wrongdoing isn't necessarily the same thing as "not fair," but in my eyes, it is fair because the user agreed to those terms of service upon registration, and their deposit was returned so they didn't actually lose any money
I want you to consider the two states of reality from before OP
dep
osited to after OP was retur
ned money.
Prior
to d
eposit: No bets ha
ve bee
n made. Balan
ce is X.
After return: Bets have been made. Ba
lance is X.
The fact that Sportsbet.io accepted bets means that they were wi
ll
ing
to t
ake the player'
s money in
the case of a loss. Given that the playe
r h
as instead
won, the casino is now instead liable to pay up. Unfortunately, due to the
m using their
arbitrary ToS, they are able to quote a clause that gives them absolute discretio
n and they are able to essent
ially nullify
the player's w
in
s.
Now im
agi
ne this.
X:
I offer you
a bet. If you win, I freeze your winnings and return your deposit. If you lose, I take your money. I
cover details allowing me to arbitrarily freeze balances if I consider you a negative to my casino in a clause outlined within the ToS. You agreed to this. I can now act accordingly to everyone else who agrees to the ToS, because of course, contracts are all-encom
passing and if you we
re too stupid to re
ad it then you deserve to get scammed.
Lo
l, what a bunch of n
ewbie dimwit
losers
for me
to take advantage of by documenting binding legal contracts. T
hey can do noth
ing about it. That's because
rules are rules, and if you accep
t it th
en you'
re vulnerable to every s
mall part of the clau
ses.
If the next post is going to be another bad-faith deflection and unrelated to AdkinsBet, then I see no point in continuing the discussion about AdkinsBet as the topic would have shifted to that of useless bickering. I'm okay with that - trolls rarely get banned after all - but it's a question as to how long this charade will be kept up.
In any case, you have the time to read the Adkinsbet terms and conditions all day long and compare them with the previous ones. People who have no interest in an organization are not going to spend all their time in it.
It took me about 5 minutes to take the archive and write "diff adkins_1 adkins_2". What does this have to do with the contents?