Do you mean like closing accounts and declining withdrawals to "get in contact" with people and have them agree to a list of demands, including "stop critique here", before reinstating the accounts of letting people withdraw
Because that has happened atleast twice now.
I do. I would have people bring proof of that here if they give a shit. That's f'd up behavior. I have no problem with a company deciding to not allow a customer to play on their site and bad mouth them at the same time - Jon Little syndrome.
Out of curiosity how do you suggest SWC identify customers to be banned for behavior off site. This is a no dox forum, as is 2p2. SWC is a no dox poker site. How on earth can you connect a SWC account with one that is on this forum by any means other than pure speculation. In theory SWC accounts only belong to the email address associated with the account. Identifying users by devices used or the location of devices used is purely an educated guess, albeit very accurate but nonetheless just an assumption that the same person is on multiple accounts. Without dox, hypothetically you could even consider an AI to be human depending on how you define a human. And this is the conundrum that is SWC. They have adopted a new attitude and a new face to their brand in the last 6 months which has infuriated a huge percentage of their base yet they have no clear means of controlling who that base is because there are no dox. You would think if a company was in this position they would try to have an open line of communication with excellent customer service to attempt to keep something in control that has so many vulnerabilities. I often think SWC has no clue how much their users loved the community at SWC and the site itself. There wouldn't be all this backlash otherwise.
I do have a problem with them holding funds hostage, and I imagine most of the BTC. community would as well.
You might want to ask SWC about this in the main thread or email them. Proof is going to be rather hard to come by unless people post emails or screenshots. Neither of which are really proof of anything.
I saw this happen. The one time I was aware of was for locking the account not holding funds because of stuff said on here. I Don't know if the player directly referenced themselves in an event or by their name. SWC did comment though that it was locked to get their attention.