ToS have been violated after the activity on his 2nd deposit(usage of VPN). We decide to refund the deposit from the 2nd deposit (37 mBTC).
The player has been contacted also on his Email. After this, we consider the case solved.
Why it's obvious that everything you are trying to avoid the bet that was place in the match of
Ruberta Carballes - Raberta Ortega bet lose or void so that nothing goes further from this bet?
You switched the same bet - reason number 3 for OP.
You voided the bet because odds were wrong - reason number 4
You then said the chain broken or something since the bet was voided - extension of reason number 4 from OP
So now we have another claim which is use of VPN and again it just to avoid the bet placed on Ruberta Carballes - Raberta Ortega?
How many more reasons we are expecting that are on the way? I do not think many people will even believe any reference that will come from your system like showing IP or such things because you have already done a lot to believe that you are capable to change your database.
Yesterday there was a guy who
caught red-handed, and he could avoid it if he would just admit that he wanted to do the scam and apologize that he will never do it again but instead he gave one after another lie to establish his first lie as a truth. A lie is a lie and a lot of other connections will prove it a lie. It's now obvious that you are doing the same as that user from yesterday.
Who is your provider?