It just occured to me. In view of the evidence* that:
- Gox was being drained out of fiat in early December (therefore someone knew Gox would collapse),
- Gox was being drained out of bitcoins in late December (therefore someone knew Gox would collapse)
the whole story of Mark Karpeles about how the hack started in the beginning of February, is simply a lie.
It was a lie Mark Karpeles told to the Japanese court and with this lie he managed to turn things into civil rehabilitation thus escaping criminal charges.
Wouldn't it be sensible that someone who speaks Japanese contacts Japanese prosecutors to press criminal charges against Mark Karpeles (at least for lying to the court)? The more we wait the more evidence gets destroyed
* Looking for someone to confirm this evidence or debunk it
- Gox was being drained out of fiat in early December (therefore someone knew Gox would collapse),
- Gox was being drained out of bitcoins in late December (therefore someone knew Gox would collapse)
the whole story of Mark Karpeles about how the hack started in the beginning of February, is simply a lie.
It was a lie Mark Karpeles told to the Japanese court and with this lie he managed to turn things into civil rehabilitation thus escaping criminal charges.
Wouldn't it be sensible that someone who speaks Japanese contacts Japanese prosecutors to press criminal charges against Mark Karpeles (at least for lying to the court)? The more we wait the more evidence gets destroyed
* Looking for someone to confirm this evidence or debunk it