I'm not advocating an armed insurrection. That would be futile.
Why? Moral precepts, first-order feasibility, or long-term sustainability?
The first would be insurmountable. The second may be surmountable with surprising ease, by innovative technique. The third is inescapably challenging.
I am advocating participation in the system to the least amount possible until in crumbles under its own weight.
That may be no less futile, and all the challenges of the third rationale continue to apply.