I read the white papers and I found them to be very interesting and promising for the direction of a cryptocurrency and that is why I am mining it. However I side WITH MightyX on the concerns of recourse and identification I don't think they are resolved. I do think Mighty's attack on you was a little harsh since I am new to the forum as well and am taking the other side. I would like to see Team Aircoin respond to MightyX's comments.
well, thanks for small amount of support hehe! Nice to see a fellow newcomer, I feel belittled by my lack of post history.
MightyX make's valid points ( Although his concerns were addressed several times, he doesn't seem to be able to grasp a clear understanding of his own questions ) , however, he had called me a sock puppet simply because I created an account to express my excitement for this coin. Isn't that what these forums are all about? Establishing a community to support development of a coin?
I was simply doing my part and finally devoting some of my time into getting involved within the community of a coin.
His motives were questionable until he singled out my post and attacked me for being new. A newcomer being excited about a coin shouldn't upset anyone. Anyone except trolls, I suppose.
Yes, welcome. We are all new posters on bitcointalk at some point. In fact it stands to reason that even TheMightyX had to be a new poster in the past. The fact that you are here and reading and commenting is a good thing for this coin. We need discussion (constructive), to move forward.
I think the last comments from Alexander is good advice for everyone: if you don't like, trust, believe, or whatever, don't invest. MightyX has spoken his mind. If he truly lacks trust in the AIRCoin team, then he should just go on his way. He stated that although the concepts have not been applied to cryptocurrencies before, they are not new or unique. I disagree, since it has not been done before, then the application of a centralized trading entity to cryptocurrency is both new and unique. To say that the concept doesn't qualify, is akin to saying that when man first traveled by airplane, it was not new or unique because birds flew, and man traveled(so, independently not new or unique). When you do something that has not been done before(centralized trading entity with cryptocurrency), it qualifies as new and unique. It will stay this way until the next coin copies it, then it may possibly become the new standard, at which point it will no longer be new or unique. It will just be the first.