1- I agree there is an issue with the reward allocation but toknormal not only overstates it, the solution he provides would absolutely destroy DASH's price, as masternodes would sell faster than the market can absorb the sudden new supply
Lol !

What do you think they've been doing for the last 3 years ?
Masternode reward has ranged from $2000 per week to $50 over the last 3 years - a range of
6000% from lowest to highest - and you're quaking in your boots at making a 30% protocol share revision that would radically address our bleeding marketcap ? Your logic defies understanding. Stop being obsessed with masternodes - this coin can go to zero with a full compliment of 5000 nodes no problem at all.
Sigh... at least you acknowledged my first point I guess. But you didn't refute it, you distract us with using the bear market as an excuse for your proposed experiment. A market where the majority of cryptos, not just DASH suffered at least 95% fall from their ATH. And people on here actually call this a discussion or debate? You immediately resort to insults.
Ok, let me state it more plainly then. If you changed the reward ratio from 60/40 to 20/80 (or 8/92 - the sweet spot?), which masternode owners do you suppose would not dump their coins within the hour of finding out? What would that massive influx of supply do to the price?
I cut the rest of your response because it added nothing new to the discussion. It's almost as if you had written it before I posted, just waiting to copy and paste it as a reply...