Too bad i can't read the code enough to valuate it, but honestly speaking, i can't see anything too innovative in this. I didn't even got the mobile wallet work and given how old this project is, i see that as a red flag. Maybe someone could point me what exactly i am missing here. And what does the Decent has that some 10 other blockchains doesn't already have?
[/quote]

Simply DECENT is better than Ethereum 

DCore provides a number of hard-coded smart contracts with wide functionality. Turing Complete contracts are not implemented since they are fundamentally insecure and would reduce DCore's well designed efficiency.

What is the difference between hard coded smart contracts and 'Turing complete' smart contracts? Turing Complete contracts can reduce the overall security and integrity of the blockchain network. The lack of ability to enforce good programming practices on users, as well as the risk that they might not be honest actors and aiming to commit fraud makes them risky to implement despite their attractions. A number of blockchains have suffered on-chain frauds through the deliberate misuse of user definable smart contracts. Transaction speed is also a big issue with user definable smart contracts taking orders of magnitude longer to trigger and run, seriously delaying transaction completion and, blockchain throughput.

Why would you prefer DCore smart contracts and what are the advantages? Because the DCore smart contracts are immutable, well tested, and implemented by skilled engineers, they provide a high level of security for both parties that engage into a contract. They are fast and facilitate the high rate of transactions per second that DCore is famous for 2000+.