Re: Should BESTCHANGE pay proven willing scam facilitators like nutildah to post?
Yeah but does he have a pill addiction?
No, you lunatic: nutildah is a drug pusher, who overtly evangelizes the use of hallucinogens such as LSD and psilocybin.
I am sure that you know this, because you saw fit to abuse your source merit privileges to reward nutildah’s LSD evangelism—including his statement to me that “nothing can prepare you for or educate you like the first-hand experience of trying a drug out for yourself.” Quote-unquote. That’s how to earn 4 merits from suchmoon!
Evidence is below.
I can't believe you haven't made up anything more serious than "a troll"
This is just like when TECSHARE attacked you when you were defending him against me.
It’s too bad that Quickseller wrote a nullius-sized wall of text, which is beyond your capability to read. —Oh, wait. Quickseller’s post was quite short. It was, however, longer than 140 characters. Are you literally unable to read anything longer than a tweet?
It is the only way that you could have failed to notice that Quickseller was making a principled defence of nutildah’s freedom of speech. Not that such a “liberal” as you would understand the a concept; you love deplatforming! Whereas Quickseller is so noble as to defend even vicious, despicable trolls from what he seems to view as a manifestation of one of cancel culture’s favourite strategies: Getting people fired from their jobs.
For that, you lobbed a bunch of off-topic personal attacks at him. You owe Quickseller an apology!
for someone who committed a grave crime of exposing your sockpuppet.
What, you mean nutildah’s long-term obsessive campaign of harassment against another forum member, based on an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory? Wait a minute: I thought that the suchmoon-nutildah narrative was that multiple different people independently noticed astounding evidence of The Truth... But this discussion is off-topic. Never mind.
OP, I am very sorry that some “people” are incapable of understanding the concept of “off-topic”. It seems like the concept of off topic isn’t clicking with suchmoon, or she disagrees with the concept. nutildah and suchmoon both need to learn to stop following around two particular forum members with these off-topic personal attacks! Please don’t fall into the trap of letting off-topic personal attacks derail this thread from its topic about nutildah.
OP, for my part, I suggest that instead of attacking nutildah’s income, you should show more generally that nutildah is untrustworthy and has untrustworthy judgment. Given that nutildah essentially acts like the lovechild of Timothy Leary and Saul Alinsky, that should be like shooting fish in a barrel.
Because I think that drug abuse accusations should be made with evidence, I will show evidence:
They can turn you into a superstitious nitwit
No more superstitious than somebody who has never experienced psychedelics for themselves but label them as "bad" without fully understanding them.
Psychedelic drugs aren't addictive and can be quite educational if you let them work their magic.
Don't knock it until you've tried it.
nullius, all you are doing is highlighting your ignorance of the subject. have a fantastic morning.
Merited by suchmoon (4), strawbs (2), vapourminer (1), 600watt (1), sirazimuth (1), P_Shep (1), soullyG (1), OutOfMemory (1)
warning: nullius-sized post follows; I tried my best to keep it engaging
[...]
You've never tripped on LSD or mushrooms, you've never been to France, so there's no possible way you could know what its about more than someone who has. All the books in the world - all your personal assessments of friends who have visited France - are no substitute for first-hand, real life experience.
[...]
But nothing can prepare you for or educate you like the first-hand experience of trying a drug out for yourself.
[...]
Funny, I've done both and I'm still not religious. If anything they've opened my mind to the possibility that maybe I don't know everything and I don't have it all figured out.
[...long, long drug-abuse evangelism rant snipped for brevity...]
[...]
You've never tripped on LSD or mushrooms, you've never been to France, so there's no possible way you could know what its about more than someone who has. All the books in the world - all your personal assessments of friends who have visited France - are no substitute for first-hand, real life experience.
[...]
But nothing can prepare you for or educate you like the first-hand experience of trying a drug out for yourself.
[...]
And there is a pretty good historical hypothesis that much religiosity has been caused by “naturally occurring” drugs—much more Amanita muscaria than psilocybin. Hmmm.
Funny, I've done both and I'm still not religious. If anything they've opened my mind to the possibility that maybe I don't know everything and I don't have it all figured out.
[...long, long drug-abuse evangelism rant snipped for brevity...]