Re: Dump overnight because of a false article about a double spend
Lots of people sounded the alarm about LN, and side chains.
The same people were sounding the alarm about SegWit telling people that your funds are going to be stolen if sent to a SegWit address by using technobabble and throwing terms such as "anyone can spend".Quote
and Liquid is the preferred "Bitcoin" for Blockstream.
There are lots of companies building centralized crap on top of bitcoin such as Tether. They all have their utilities but they are still centralized crap.Quote
It was incredibly painful the split in 2018.
Bitcoin has never had any "splits".Quote
I saw a "fork" that everyone was telling me was fake. I knew though the "fake" one represented everything I had always believed in Bitcoin and the "real" one had diverged and become something else. Letting go of BTC was the hardest decision in my life.
You again shot yourself in the foot. All the arguments you made in your previous posts about the "double spend" are true in all the bitcoin copies from LTC and DOGE down to shitcoins like BCH, BTG, BTV, BSV,... they all inherit the same characteristics of bitcoin since they are copies of the protocol.Same 2 competing transactions could take place in any of these chains and be included in two different blocks, one in the main chain and another a stale block (orphan is wrong term).
Quote
bitcoin core's removal of Whitepaper
I was wondering how long it took for you people to use it this way 
Quote
The next step is CSW will pursue reclaiming the Bitcoin brand through the courts,
In other words you believe that bitcoin is a centralized thing that is owned by one person. Good to know your real views!