| | | | |
| Address | Account | Date | action | other |
| 17k4EVPznuTQ7q7CujbFFvTqx97ff6CZZN | | 9/15/2017 | part of wallet | transaction ID |
| 122h7dmX8vcdNnWjfbz1eevD8tfcJasBWV | figmentofmyass | | sent to | part of ChipMixer campaign |
| | | | |
I am trying to understand the connection. Sorry I am very poor in it :-P
How do you get these two addresses connected to find that the address 17k4EVPznuTQ7q7CujbFFvTqx97ff6CZZN is connected with the user figmentofmyass? I am using it as an example to understand your table format?
The address next to the account name is the address they used to enroll in a sig campaign.
The address above that received coins from the sig campaign address and sent coins to an address which also received coins from the 8 other sig campaign addresses. That's the simplest way I can explain it. If you take a look at this transaction, and then examine the inputs of all the addresses which funded the transaction, you'll see they all came from sig campaign payments:
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/2f068dddc4c24b8771bc0d46671e38d80b834198d9e99a7329d2d2a946c3fc19The table formatting didn't come out as well as in the preview, unfortunately.