As of right now, all the Cointerra has done is make 1.3TH/s boxes into 1.6TH/s boxes with new firmware
Yes, it is unbelievable that HashFast beat
Cointerra to demonstrating a 2TH/s miner, especially since Cointerra advertised "500GH/s" chips and was supposedly the ASIC Dream Team.
Even more unvelievable is that HashFast's Sierra EVO only uses 3 chips to get 2TH/s, while
Cointerra's uses 4 and only gets ~1.6 (if you're lucky).
What a treat to unveil our 2TH/s beast in Austin, right in
Cointerra's back yard!

OTOH, Cointerra's chip is still being misrepresented as "500GH/s" when it actually only gets about 400GH/s. Even after a two month delay, they couldn't get their machines to run at the promised 2TH/s. The only company in the world selling mining equipment that really hashes at 2TH/s is HashFast (hence our name).
True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?
This is the Custom Hardware subforum. We are supposed to discuss things like
-HashFast ASIC specs (original 400GH/s goal met, now up to 800GH/s)
-Cointerra ASIC specs (much less than original 500GH/s target)
In other news, Cointerra *did not* demonstrate a working 2.1TH/s miner in Austin at last week's Bitcoin Conference, or anywhere else. Ever.
I'm confused. Is this the Cointerra thread? Why does HF_CL keep talking about Cointerra, Cointerra, Cointerra?
I bought a HF product. Please ship it.