Some good items pointed out here.Seems the more I read articles around the internet the more negative the feedback is. So I certainly appreciate the insight provided here.

Reading through some excerpts from the lawsuit through the site and they are pinning it a bit more saying the SEC has a much stronger case than initially thought.
Appears there was negligence on the accord of Larsen and co. by not actually going to the SEC to confirm if they would be a security back in 2013.

https://www.coinbureau.com/analysis/sec-ripple-lawsuit/

I guess time will tell. Hoping for a positive outcome as I hold quite a bit of the position.
I think even a settlement and being not deemed a security would still be a positive as opposed to entirely shut down.

Thanks again!