I don't really get what you're trying to say here...
Fresh coins = coins coming from a coinbase reward, coins without history... This is basically the unofficial defenition of fresh coins... You already understood this from the start, since you initially said you were working with russian and chinese miners.

I personally think that somebody could make a lot of money selling the unspent outputs from a coinbase reward at a higher profit margin... The thing is: if you promise fresh coins, you have to deliver fresh coins, not start telling us the coinbase rewards are hidden, mixed, aged,... This means nothing to us, fresh = fresh, not mixed, split up, aged, hidden,.... Some of these things don't make any sense at all, hence i label them "smoke and mirrors" (in other words: a clever way of distracting people by dragging in a lot of technical details newbies might not comprehend).

Age does NOT come into this equation by the way. Like i said in my previous post: if Satoshi himself would sell the coinbase reward of one of the first couple of hundred blocks he mined 10 years ago, the unspent output funding the buyer's address would only be 1 step away from a coinbase reward, hence it would be called "fresh" by any definition of the word. Fresh has nothing to do with age, but only with the distance between the analysed unspent output and the unspent output generated as a coinbase reward.


I don't really have a suggestion... The thing is: you can not, under any circumstances promise to dispense "fresh coins from russian and chinese mining farms" but then send somebody funds that are in no way coming from any mining reward dozens of levels deep. It's just that simple...

If you open up a butcher shop and you sell only pig's meat, you cannot sell (cheaper) chicken's meat instead. You said you were selling pig, when i get the meat i bought from you analysed, it better be coming from a pig. If it's chicken, the exuse that the chicken was fed some expired pig's meat a week ago will not stand.
You are selling fresh coins, so they'd better be fresh. If not you'll need to rebrand your operation. The blockchain is an open ledger. Anybody can parse all the blocks and follow the trail of unspent outputs. If you twist the truth, you'll get caught.
There's a market for a normal mixer, there is no shame in being one... There probably will be a market for somebody that doesn't want his mixing output coming from other clients of your mixer.... There's probably a market for people that want to be payed using funds that can be directly linked to coinbase rewards... Just see which category you fit in and tell the truth... That's the only way you'll have a sustainable business. If you twist the truth, you'll start getting negative trust on bitcointalk and other forum's, you'll get negative reviews on many platforms, you'll get negative messages on twitter, reddit,... and you'll only get a handfull customers a day.


I see you didn't answer a single one of my questions, so i'll ask them again... Could you please provide an answer?

• Do you stand by your claim that says you're providing fresh coins?
• Do you understand that, in the bitcoin world, fresh means: "coming from a coinbase reward"?
• Is TryNinja telling the truth when he posted the withdrawal transaction id?
• Do you see a flaw in my logic when i dug 5000 of the closest transactions funding TryNinja's output and only found 2 very distant coinbase rewards adding allmost nothing?
• Do you see a flaw in my logic when i calculated that only 0,000000000000000019% of the value funding TryNinja's "clean" addresses comes from a coinbase reward from the 5000 closest transactions funding those clean addresses?
• Are you still unwilling to let your partners prove they are real miners by mining a block using a new address as a coinbase reward without adding an identifying OP_RETURN and sign a message using this new address (so there is no way to identify them?)
• Last time, i identified the 2 blocks that could very remotely be linked to TryNinja's output to be coming from 1THash&58COIN. Are they your partners?
• Apparently, in a PM to Vod, you claimed to have "a way of sending coin without revealing the sending address". If this is true, you should share the technical details... If it's just security trough obscurity you are NOT protecting your clients. Only by sharing technical details, we can asses if the method you claim to have discovered is valid, and will keep on protecting your clients in the future. If you are unwilling to give the method, i can only assume it does not exist, or it's a method that will sooner or later be discovered by others that can then use it to de-anonimise your past clients
• Do you understand that, when you say you have 50 BTC but proof nothing, we are a big sceptical?
• Do you understand that, when you say you have 50 BTC but your site tells us you have >5000 BTC, you are putting complete trust in the hands of your partners? What if somebody initialises a 100 BTC mix and your partner's api is not completely working (or then ran away), you'll be standing there unable to provide a mix eventough you promised to do so?
• Once again: are you the developer or are you defending somebody else's script?
• Once again: do you understand all the technical details of your operations or did you pay somebody else to do it for you?
• Once again: why are the security headers not yet fixed
• Why do you run an nginx version with known vulnerability's
• Why do you include external javascript