Re: This shitty Merit System has ruined Bitcointalk and made it like Facebook
Also signature campaigns now a days requires Merit earn counts in their previous months, which is impossible for us to have. 
Earning merits is not impossible, dude. But when you admit to stuff like this: We low quality posters had already accept the fact, that we are not eligible for ranking up what ever we may do.
You're pretty much admitting that you don't put any effort into your posts and don't want to do the work required to make your posts merit-worthy. That's on you. And I'm assuming your first language isn't English, but there are merit sources on a lot of the local boards that can be of help....if you put in the effort.But on signature campaigns, it's entirely different. People try making high quality posts, otherwise they won't be accepted in future campaigns. At least this is the way I see it.
Depends on the signature campaign and the campaign manager. If you have a very selective campaign like Chipmixer, you're going to get some of the best posters on the forum, and it's run by a firm but fair manager, DarkStar_. Other campaigns have been known to let spammers/shitposters in, and there's very little oversight. But I would agree that bounties are full of idiots posting nonsense nonstop, and the bounty managers generally don't seem to care all that much.