I am taking advice of many folks and stopping answering any questions. I'll poke my head in at least once a day or two to say "Still here" and that is all. The next time you receive anything of substance it will be a full report on the subject which will take time to produce. There are 94 pages of NJ Laws that pertain to this matter, let alone the federal laws. Contained in this report will be all legal matter as well as a pheonixed contract. If you don't like it, sue LRM. But I must warn you, that you will lose, and cost yourself money twice because the money used to fight the legal battles will be that of the company's. This is the last thing any of us want, but it seems to be a trend in Bitcoin lately to sue over everything.
I'm looking out for my interests, as well as those of the company and all those involved. To those of you who have known me going on 2 years now, you know I'm not some evil thief. I'm doing what's necessary and I believe that the end result will be something everyone can live with.
I'd bet there are many many more folks that would be advising you to answer any of the simple questions.
For that matter. How could they advise you of that if you haven't actually answered any of the most obvious questions that have people all tensed up?
BTW: What is a "pheonixed contract"?
The trend in bitcoin isn't that people are suing for everything, the trend is some people are outright scamming and some are very poorly managing other people's investments.
If you wanted to defuse half of the tension in this thread (if not more)... you could just say this:
"Just like the 3 for 1 issue. I will proportionately add more bonds to accounts as the whole company hashrate grows. And if I figure out a a better way, then that will be implemented. But the spirit of the original agreement will be honored as closely as possible." (or something along those lines - just trying to communicate is respectable, imo)
Your priority should be this Zack.
1. Investors
2. You
3. The company
Not:
1. You
2. The company
3. Investors