Still no scientific proof against the existence of God. Simply play-babies' theory stories and mumblings, as expected from jokers who believe in the religion of science, rather than understanding science.
True, perhaps, but lack of proof of the non-existence (or existence) of a god is not evidence of the existence (or non-existence) of a god.
Also, they are not the same. Compare:
Theist: God exists.
Atheist: What's your proof?
Theist: Bible, appeal to authority, flawed logic, etc.
Atheist: Not good enough.
Atheist: God does not exist.
Theist: What's your proof?
Atheist: Sorry, you're right. I can't prove it.
Theist: Aha!
God has no intelligence - god just is.
Simply making a claim that something exists is not evidence of its existence. You'll have to do better. Plus, if a god exists but that's all, then what good is that?