The first social experiment result in... People didn't create one token/address... the distribution allowed for more than one, provided you didn't "cheat" by using bots/vms/restarting your router...
Definitely an interesting social experiment. People generally do not take their 'fair' share. This is obvious.
What the distribution did allow was for certain groups to gain advantage over others based upon things like their work situations.
Lets say a school decides to have an apple give-away. They say that any student can come throughout the day to get the apples.
Some of the teachers dismiss their classes and let their students get apples, and others do not.
Is this fair?
In this situation I am just as committed as everyone else, I just did not have the resources available to sit around all day getting stake. Are the people who do not have jobs or school somehow more committed now? Why should the system be set up so they get more?