As soon as you want to give them red tag, they write it on their telegram group and enough people will make sure they oppose the card.
Do you have proof of this or
is this just fantasy? If you don't, then why bother saying it at all?
I agree that it is a very dangerous and risky idea, but without a third party to get involved in this conflict it will be difficult to find a solution. because there is always a TOS who is a god for gambling sites and casinos and on the other side there is always a smart guy who breaks this TOS and it is difficult to know who is telling the truth
What happens if cases like these become more common?
There are a few avenues I can think of directly:
- The casino is increasingly selectively scamming
- Casino exploiters are increasingly being restricted with reason
- A combination of both
If you want to have DefaultTrust users intervening every time one of these cases comes up and inevitably ends in, "you broke ToS" (look at past casino cases and see how many have this result), then you're basically pushed the issue of "who do I believe" to just the DefaultTrust users and the very limited evidence they would be provided by the casino.