The article just repeats what other people have written elsewhere. It does not add anything new. Most of the article is fluff.
The meat of the article justifying the $10 million price is based on flawed assumptions, misconceptions, and ignorance of basic economics.
Each halving is followed by a ‘supply shock’ as the supply fails to meet demand and buyers bid up the price of each Bitcoin until it reaches multiples of its pre-halving price.
The halving does not cause a "supply shock". The
production is cut in half but the supply continues to increase every 10 minutes.
What follows is a bull run that lasts for about a year or so, followed by a bear market. These four-year-cycles draw in more Bitcoin users and holders with each iteration.
Contrary to popular belief there is no four-year cycle and there is no correlation between halvings and price increases. Those that make these claims are cherry-picking the data.