He applied it the way he saw it working the best.  That may have been selfish of him, but it's no different than what any of us do.  Techshare made no secrets about his views, they're all out in the open.  He may have used it in a way that many of us disagreed with (obviously,) but the only thing he did that was even remotely abuse was retaliatory exclusions.  Seems rather low and the "Trust System Abuse" scale, don't you think?  And, are we really so petty that we're going to nitpick "abuse" by someone who isn't even here anymore?  Isn't the point moot now?


That's uncalled for.  If you have something critical to say in this thread, at least have the courteously and respect to articulate it without hurling vulgarities.