Re: CoinTerra announces its first ASIC - Hash-Rate greater than 500 GH/s
The Proof is soon to come and the HalfTard_CL can be laid to rest, I've been testing a beta FW and yes these boxes are more than capable to hit the 2 TH/s mark (with Burst of 5 sec in the 3+ Th/s), and here it shows that yes 4 chips is better than 3.
FACT CoinTerra can achieve 2TH/s = True
FACT HF are Thieves that sell Lies ,and Trolls with Deceptive marketing.
I cant believe you show your face in another thread.... go back to your self moderated thread until your company stops scamming people....
Minor Miner advised me to
So that's what I'm going to do.
Now, have you any input on the issue of whether or not Cointerra's claim to have "greater than 500 GH/s" is true?
All I see on this thread are numerous reports of the "greater than 500 GH/s" claim in the OP being empirically false, citing demonstrated performance shortcomings of 20% under spec or worse.
Given the two unverified claims of 2TH CT boxes in the wild, we should resolve the matter in a calm, rational manner.
AFAIK only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH miner (at this week's Austin BTC conference).
But I'd love to see proof my belief is outdated or wrong. Are you going to help answer, or just attack me for daring to ask an on-topic, if impudent, question?
I read your sig too fast & got "Halfassed Community Liason"
So you got a new title
True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?
FACT CoinTerra can achieve 2TH/s = True
FACT HF are Thieves that sell Lies ,and Trolls with Deceptive marketing.
Is there any proof of a CT box doing 2TH, or are the haters making stuff up just to troll?
I cant believe you show your face in another thread.... go back to your self moderated thread until your company stops scamming people....
Minor Miner advised me to
stay up to date on what is available in the market right now.
So that's what I'm going to do.
Now, have you any input on the issue of whether or not Cointerra's claim to have "greater than 500 GH/s" is true?
All I see on this thread are numerous reports of the "greater than 500 GH/s" claim in the OP being empirically false, citing demonstrated performance shortcomings of 20% under spec or worse.
Given the two unverified claims of 2TH CT boxes in the wild, we should resolve the matter in a calm, rational manner.
AFAIK only HashFast has demonstrated a working 2TH miner (at this week's Austin BTC conference).
But I'd love to see proof my belief is outdated or wrong. Are you going to help answer, or just attack me for daring to ask an on-topic, if impudent, question?
I read your sig too fast & got "Halfassed Community Liason"
So you got a new title
True or False: CoinTerra's first ASIC's Hash-Rate is greater than 500 GH/s?