⭐ Merited by JustinBounty (1)
Not fluent in English? Here's a possible solution: use the Local section or learn enough English to be constructive?
How does one determine he is now fluent in English and ready to spam the forum with better English? Someone must be better than you at English and according to them you should be learning now, so are you moving to local sections?
(Please don't, we need some good posters)
You are the one who brought up fluency:How does one determine he is now fluent in English and ready to spam the forum with better English? Someone must be better than you at English and according to them you should be learning now, so are you moving to local sections?
(Please don't, we need some good posters)I love the idea but I think forcing your standards to other users who might be not as well educated and fluent with English is not the right idea.
I'm simply responding to the notion that the lack of English proficiency can somehow serve as an excuse for spamming the forum.
I certainly don't wander into the Local sections with broken grammar talking about how the bitcoin will go up or down and that it's unpredictable and that you should buy the dip.
Maybe someone starts the same trend as you have here in the local boards, then where shall the user go?
Is that what the Local boards are like currently? If not, then I don't see how this is relevant. I also don't see the Local boards getting as many posts as the main boards nor a reasonable likelihood for your hypothetical situation. Seems to me like it's a bit of a false equivalency - especially comparing a current problem with a future potential problem.Maybe someone starts the same trend as you have here in the local boards, then where shall the user go?
Doesn't make sense to enter a signature campaign that primarily asks for English-based board posting without the skills to do so, wouldn't you agree?
There is a designated signature campaign manager to moderate that and if you don't trust the manager to remove the spammers then the feedback shall be more suited to the manager as opposed to the participant.
How is that relevant to the constructiveness of your posts? The signature managers are not the same people who moderate the forum. You can see that from the users on the blacklist: plenty have joined campaigns and yet have scores of posts that are considered unsubstantial?There is a designated signature campaign manager to moderate that and if you don't trust the manager to remove the spammers then the feedback shall be more suited to the manager as opposed to the participant.