OK. I am really trying to wind this down now so I skipped replying to a comment above (though apparently your definitions don't agree with your interpretations) and I'll keep this brief. He said that he didn't want to be strongarmed into contributing to this scheme because it is *his* money, 30% or 0.01%. It does not follow that he wouldn't voluntarily contribute in the least. That is entirely something that you have overlayed onto things.