So you are saying that it's only a pure coincidence if all withdraws months before, follow the same sequence of 10.000 sat + n [n= 0 to 1000] ?
No. He's saying that 10,000 is the minimum withdrawal and they process them in sequence with the smallest first. Therefor what to you looks "fake" looks completely logical and normal to anyone that actually thought about it for a few seconds.
this sounds logical to me. i cant really see why this is suspicious
i dont have the tools or know-how, but im sure there is someone out there who can run some sort of blockchain analysis on the payment transactions. to see if there is any evidence they are fake