With good liquidity and platform usefulness in mind as the most important matter, wouldn't it further strengthening the argument that they need an adequate exchange with good quality rather than average (or below average) ones with poor performance? If we suppose they goes according to plan, or perhaps adding three more exchange for IEO (a lower tier exchange), and one or two of them create troubles in withdrawal, high fee, lost balance, etc, wouldn't you agree that people will automatically reflect and consider the project as poor and faulty? I would prefer quality over quantity for IEO, and once the project established, they can add more (and perhaps less reputable) exchanges.
I absolutely agree with you. But how to get listing on Binance? I think that it is very difficult for new project. If it was simple all projects would have listing on Binance, because the listing on Binance is the best marking and all investors are waiting new projects with listing on Binance. Savix will start from the listing on Uniswap because it is a DeFi projects. But to have a good price on Uniswap it is necessary to have a listing on centralize exchanges with good liquidity. I think that they Exmarket because it is more simple to get listing on Exmarket. But it is olny my opinion. I do not know how difficult is to get listing on Exmarket.
Well, if we traced back, I am not the one suggesting binance, or saying anything about it at all. I am simply suggesting to go with just latoken instead of taking exmarket too. Ask the one bringing binance into the topic, @pintadj