He's accusing MCM of being a SCAMMER, in the title, and multiple posts and forums the web, and dark web. He's trying to 'hire a hacker' for if nothing more than nefarious reasons to somehow Dox or Hack MCM's website..  Even though in all likelihood he was phished. The burden of proof lies with the accuser. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. There is no evidence that he submitted it to MCM and MCM says he doesn't have it. OP doesn't have the LoG. You would think for $600k OP would instead contact the authorities, but why hasn't he? He hasn't even answered the question why he sent $600k all at once in the first place. He admits to screwing up every step of the process. You don't just fall off your bike, and immediately start accusing the bike manufacturer of creating a flawed bike. You better have proof that the bike is falty... In this case, OP doesn't have any scrapes or bruises and conveniently the bike is missing so there is no evidence. Does that not absolve MCM? Eh, depends on how you look at it. In this instance character matters. You just need to read this thread to really understand, he was more than likely phished. Oh, and off-topic, he's likely dealing with stolen Bitcoins.. but I mean, what does that matter?