Well I took a look at the trust he's left (at least the feedbacks written in English), and there's nothing worse in there than anything Lauda had given. I see Ratimov has tagged a lot of account sellers and didn't seem to be giving out negs for frivolous reasons, though he tagged some members as being alts and I don't know if they're alts of scammers or what. A lot of his negative feedbacks were worded very strongly, but I don't see that as a big deal.
Feedback means nothing under proof. And all the links left by Ratimov in Russian, have you read them? If not how can you then say that the feedback left by him is justified. You trust suchmoon opinion and he understands Russian like Royse777 too. Formally, this means that you can trust their opinion regarding exceptions.
To convince you, you can choose any feedback left by him and I will translate the evidence for you and suchmoon will certify their authenticity.
And yet the fact remains that Ratimov got removed from the Chipmixer campaign, so something must have happened. I thought he might have gotten a DT neg, but that isn't the case. Last I checked there was nothing about it in the Chipmixer thread.
Darkstar is very tolerant so he will not disclose the reason. But you should have guessed anyway.
I haven't looked at the feedback legendster has left for others, but I will after this post and if it looks like he's left a bunch of retaliatory feedback I'll exclude him from my trust list (not that it'll do much good, as I'm only on DT2 right now). I know he's a volatile personality, almost like TECSHARE was, so it wouldn't surprise me if he is misusing the trust system--but I'm not saying he is, because I haven't looked for myself.
Could you explain the difference between the fact that you excluded legendster and the fact that you do not see abuse in Ratimov's actions? If it's not difficult for you, then answer.