Re: Reference topic: Why are these members excluded on trust lists?
airfinex, where were you taught to lie and distort the facts so blatantly? I understand, of course, that once I crossed the road for you and now you are presenting facts in a light favorable to you, but let's take a little look at your false writings:
Lies, none of my feedback contains such a phrase. Then you lied. If not, please show me this tag that contains this phrase.
You lied again. These words contain only 27-30 tags, and I left more than 600 tags. Is that the majority for you? You're having math problems, boy. You also like to distort facts. And besides, most of the tags were left by essentially 2 users who are in the Russian locale from dozens of accounts, such as a korner. So in this part you lied too. Move on.
You're lying again, besides BestChange manager, such managers as Hhampuz, efialtis, Alex077 also received tags for transactions. I participated in their campaigns and received crypto from them.
eddie13 did not check the information and immediately rolled out the opinion that I earned 3000 merit for google translate. Seriously? There is a bunch of material in Russian that I did from scratch completely and for this I earned merit, and he throws such statements without even checking the information. I do not trust the judgments of such a person who is not responsible for his words and spreads such false information.
Here the information is presented in such a way as if he had quoted me and I gave him a tag for this. But you're lying again. The tag was given for the fact that he began to spread information in different sections that I make money on the forum in corruption schemes. Of course, no proofs were presented, sheer blah-blah-blah. So you lied here too, the tag was not put for a quote.
Here you are also lying, just juggling facts as it suits you. The fact that you created an accusation against me is a fact, then that I left you a neutral tag is a fact. But why did you decide that these two facts are interconnected? You just wanted to think so.
You got feedback for getting so caught up in your dislike for me that you already started doing cheap trolling. Tell me for what purpose in the topic Reporter Statistics did you leave this shitpost?
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5580/55805361.html
The goal was trolling, of course, because your shitpost was not carrying any informative or payload. That's why you got your feedback. And not for what you imagined there. You submitted fake unverified information again.
So learn to present information about the user to the community as it really is, and not as you want to decorate it and present it in a favorable light for yourself. Your words don't smell like objectivity. Alas.
son of a bitch
Lies, none of my feedback contains such a phrase. Then you lied. If not, please show me this tag that contains this phrase.
Stupid idiot, troll, schizophrenic, Idiot with a broken head, this is how the text of the majority of feedback left by Ratimov begins.
You lied again. These words contain only 27-30 tags, and I left more than 600 tags. Is that the majority for you? You're having math problems, boy. You also like to distort facts. And besides, most of the tags were left by essentially 2 users who are in the Russian locale from dozens of accounts, such as a korner. So in this part you lied too. Move on.
which have nothing to do with real transactions, except for reviews to the BestChange manager.
You're lying again, besides BestChange manager, such managers as Hhampuz, efialtis, Alex077 also received tags for transactions. I participated in their campaigns and received crypto from them.
eddie13 expressed his opinion and Ratimov added him to the list of distrust.
eddie13 did not check the information and immediately rolled out the opinion that I earned 3000 merit for google translate. Seriously? There is a bunch of material in Russian that I did from scratch completely and for this I earned merit, and he throws such statements without even checking the information. I do not trust the judgments of such a person who is not responsible for his words and spreads such false information.
We have a complete newb on DT1, who has been kicked from his sig camp for basically sig spamming/merit farming through the deceptive use of google translate (bordering on outright plagiarism), is throwing out shit negative ratings of nothing but personal insults for many of those who speak of it, shit positive ratings, and leaving retaliatory exclusions for basically anyone who says anything or excludes him..
fxpc quoted Ratimov and received an unreasonable red label
Here the information is presented in such a way as if he had quoted me and I gave him a tag for this. But you're lying again. The tag was given for the fact that he began to spread information in different sections that I make money on the forum in corruption schemes. Of course, no proofs were presented, sheer blah-blah-blah. So you lied here too, the tag was not put for a quote.
I published evidence of plagiarism using Google translator and Ratimov offended me right away.
Here you are also lying, just juggling facts as it suits you. The fact that you created an accusation against me is a fact, then that I left you a neutral tag is a fact. But why did you decide that these two facts are interconnected? You just wanted to think so.
You got feedback for getting so caught up in your dislike for me that you already started doing cheap trolling. Tell me for what purpose in the topic Reporter Statistics did you leave this shitpost?
https://loyce.club/archive/posts/5580/55805361.html
Quote
Congratulations, these are really impressive numbers. However, it is strange how such a dumbass as you who passes off other people's articles for your own sent 37 thousand successful reports.
The goal was trolling, of course, because your shitpost was not carrying any informative or payload. That's why you got your feedback. And not for what you imagined there. You submitted fake unverified information again.
So learn to present information about the user to the community as it really is, and not as you want to decorate it and present it in a favorable light for yourself. Your words don't smell like objectivity. Alas.