it is a very good opinion Daltonik, and very valid also. we could certainly go in that sense and it would work. but let's consider what motivates the choice to keep going with the current model:

The current inflation is actually not a lot. You are looking at the total and think it is high, but it is not. The inflation is dynamically calculated to remain stable and pegged to active miner count to a ratio of 10 tokens per day per miner.  so each if the inflation seems large, it is only because the number of active miners of IUM has grown VERY quickly! 

so, we have a lot of tokens, but also a lot of users. But every real user brings a larger economy, with more activity, more hands to use these tokens, and the economy increases with ewvery new user. so, the token count goes up, but so does the size of the economy, proportionally.

at 10 tokens per day per miner, it's an average of 3650 tokens per year per miner. it really is not such a large amount. so we really have to take the total "per capita", and never as a whole.

What IUM is doing has never occurred in the history of humanity. Never in history has a resource been:

1. impossible to corner by anyone, available to all at all times
2. inflation actively and proportionally pegged to the number of active miners at all times.

this has never been done before, we are making history here!  and the results will be the best, most stable and most accurate inflation ever; Laser precision!

so let's keep going and let the IUM ecosystem continue to grow, and you will see, the IUM economy will be the most stable of all, because the model is balanced now and forever.

the whitepaper will be updated in the coming weeks to explain the inflation model in greater detail. this will help explain it well. as soon as i have time to write it...