While I disagree with dkbit98's trust rating for the spammer, I gotta laugh at the OPs conversion from a trust abuser to a lecturer on the correct use of the trust system. It sounds fake and contrived, based entirely on their personal dislike of each other more than anything else.
Good catch! But he changed it to neutral and I don't think anyone would have problems if dkbit98 just changes it to neutral too. He just doesn't understand the point, does dkbit98.
As far as I can see, dkbit98 has already changed it to neutral. In addition, I inferred from his reference that the negative tag was more of a warning than a permanent trust rating.
...
And you are doing this all the time, so I am temp-tagging you as a spammer.
And you are doing this all the time, so I am temp-tagging you as a spammer.
I can't say if this is the proper use of the trust system or not, but since we don't have a de-merit system available, we would certainly benefit from the new anti-spam methods on the forum.
