Plus one for this. I agree. I am also confused sometimes with mBTC. That is not the usual unit used outside gambling platforms. Mostly, it is being used in gambling but since a lot are more exposed to just pure BTC or Satoshis as units then it should just be provided as an option. That's to avoid confusion that might amount to a different bet unintentionally.
I choose
BTC as a unit in my wallet and honestly I have to pay a little second to think of m
BTC when I checked my account. Although I know that the m
BTC unit is used by gambling sites but it won't harm if the Futuur team consider to give users 2 options. Who like
BTC unit, choose it and who don't like it, let's choose m
BTC unit. It can be integrated as optional preferences for users.
I think the reason why mBTC is being commonly used among betting platforms is that Bitcoin's price is now very high. It is not expected that gamblers will be betting whole BTC or even 0.5 BTC or lower. It is expected that majority of the gamblers will be betting with mBTC amounts
It is what gamblers prefer. They would prefer to use small altcoins as Dogecoin to bet with hundred or thousand of Dogecoin rather than choose 1 m
BTC to bet. Big quantity looks more attractive than small quantity no matter how much does it cost.
Your comment make sense for the future, so what unit gambler will prefer when 1 BTC has a value of $1,000,000.