What are "we" saying now then?

Are we in like mid-2017 ish price levels, where we might have a decently large pullback before continuing up in a kind of blow-off top?

Or might we end up in more of a kind of 2013 double top performance where we might be somewhere in the first price bubble (whether it has peaked or not might be another question), and then our pullback would be longer than the one(s) that happened after August 2017.

I keep getting the sense that the top of this particular bubble could end up dragging into 1st quarter or 2nd quarter of 2022.. but surely there is a whole hell of a time between now and then, so it is difficult to suggest how this bubble could get there - so maybe in the end, those folks who have been more reliant on the four year fractal for providing their guidance end up being correct and we just get another cycle that ends up playing itself out in the last quarter of 2021.. I still don't know how that happens either and could reasonably result in tops that range anywhere in the $150k territory to even up to $1.5 million.. and yeah no one finds this helpful to have such a broad range and the higher end of the range does come off as a bit over-the-top in terms of probabilities, especially to be able to reach it by the end of the year (which then causes me to consider that if the top ends up being even close to that $1.5million high for this cycle, then it just seems more reasonable that the cycle could take a wee bit longer to play out).

Surely, difficult to speak with any kind of confidence without coming off as a wee bit of a kook.. but at the same time, I have hardly any sense of financial expectations that any of the UPpity BTC price performances need to play out to make me feel MOAR better financially.. even though psychologically there could be some good feelings in regards to pointing at the no coiners who had continued to fail/refuse to take any kinds of meaningful actions to acquire some corns in case they catch on.. and BTC prices going up to the upper end of the range - even $500k to $1.5k would surely be quite validating (just in case some of us don't already feel validated enough.. .I was even feeling pretty validated in the $10k to $20k range.. so, there is that angle, too)


Showing me or the thread (hate to presume too much about the we) for that matter your wallet is not going to work to establish some kind of bludgeoning effect you insecure deranged fuck.

Do you believe anyone gives any ratt's asses about the size of your dick (I mean wallet?).  

It hardly matters in regards to talking about subjects on this thread, and the hypothetical that I outlined in my earlier showed a range of BTC holdings between 10 coins and 600 coins, and if you happen to have 6,000 coins or more you could either be plugged into the hypothetical, which of course, such size of wallet may well justify some other strategies.. including some of the dumbass practices that your whining ass has been following that include selling a chunk of your BTC at $16k and buying other chunks all the way up between $25k and $55k.. but whatever..

I am not even saying that you are wrong when you might have even more excessive number of coins than the more excessive of the coins that I had outlined in my hypothetical (600), and largely, if you were to show a wallet larger than 600BTC you would be making my point rather than rebutting my point.

Both you, BAAAAWWWB, and biodom smiosnom, have recently made the dumbass suggestion that I might gain more credibility if I were to show some real world proofs regarding the size of my dick (I mean wallet), and surely it continues to be difficult to get some people to move away from these kinds of bullshit, largely irrelevant and frequently counter-productive kinds of thinking.  I could give some more examples of such, but I am going to hold back for now... (removed explicative... hahahahaha - cause I am feeling nice,   ... #nohomo)