The reason I started tagging abusers when they post allegations is for my personal use. A surprising number of them come back and post something else in our thread and the feedback is there to remind me who I am talking to. I started doing that a long time before I somehow got included in DT.
I'm seriously baffled by this. This is the second presumably otherwise reputable and sane person within the last couple of weeks saying that they use red trust as their own personal notebook. Do you really not see an issue with this? Neutral is there for this exact use case.
Maybe I didn't explain it fully. I only tag people who I am 100% certain have stolen from us. I think that theft is a valid reason to distrust someone.
The part I expressed above is simply that a long time ago I didn't bother doing it and an account came back complaining about being banned many months later I didn't realise it was the same abuser I had caught before.
Anyway, I replaced my neg with a neutral now that half of the reason for it is no longer valid.
Maybe we could discuss it in PM so savetheFORUM can lock the thread.
@savetheFORUM I didn't realise I was currently in DT. Ironically, I used to bounce in and out depending on suchmoon winning the DT1 lottery but they removed me from their list some time ago. I have my own trust list so I don't really pay to much attention to DT anymore.