I've heard the 100% sovereignty argument before.
But i think it hides responsibilities of other actors more powerfull  in the cryptosystem and ofcourse of youbube and
could be an excuse of inertia and indifference.

I think every tech has its supporters and its newcomers.

So pointing the finger to the responsibility of a newcomer is founded when a community/organization has
done sth to warn or educate. So has he? I think the last 10 months speak ofthemselves.
Dirty addresses in cardano have touched 360.000.000 ada  atleast.

I feel that in our case there is relactancy to warn because there is greed and fomo in equal scales
to supporters as newcomers.

Meaning, that warnings could put a tag to the business as not newbie friendly and scare people away and press prices.

So i find it at least questionable when a  cryptonetwork  attract  newcomers by nice stories but hides
an attack on the same newcomers .