I ask someone else to scan with avast his fingerprint on his pc and he get same fingerprint on 2 pc, pc are connected to different ISP, both different configuration, this is discutable and can bring a lot of problems, how many active users share same fingerprint in your website now?
Regarding that 35 guys have same fingerprint as me is either clear a mistake or tools that give same fingerprint either just a sand in the eyes to have reason to block
So you are saying that you use anti-tracking software? The point of this software is to hide amongst the crowd. Self-referring would defeat the purpose of using these tools because then you are only trying to hide among a crowd made up entirely of yourself.
This guy is too thick to realise he has already convicted himself. When he first started going on about the fingerprint he posted proof of its uniqueness. Even if his latest bullshit was true. What are the chances of 36 people all using the same "tool" signing up to the same referrer one after another a few days apart for 6 months? Again it absolutely zero.
If there is a rule say can't roll 24 times a day tell me where it is?
The first rule in the site's terms of service is do not use bots. It's on the sign up page. If you are rolling 24 times a day then you are obviously using a bot.
[/quote]
The fingerprint evidence itself is absolutely damning but there is so much more.
There is zero chance that on 2020-09-25 someone signed up to a referral link using a proxy server hosted by AWS and started making 24 free rolls every day. Then a few days later someone else came along and did exactly the same thing. That pattern then repeated every few days until the 38th and last one signed up on 2021-03-12. (there would have been many more if I hadn't banned him).
If it had been a more sophisticated bot that was capable of faking unique fingerprints it still would have been a 100% certainty to be a bot. That pattern of usage is not natural human behaviour.