No, I was clear about my source regarding the baseless information I received that lauda had a pill addiction:
The information I received was from someone who I trusted at the time, but I have seen to bend and stretch the truth. A review of my other private conversations with this person reflects even more egregious examples of this, including examples of while I cannot affirmatively say is a lie, some representations are what I would consider to be dishonest.
Exactly my point. The above is "clear" the same way all your other lies are "clear".
Over the years, people have told me things. I am guessing the person who told me they know lauda's IRL identity is reading this, and they can post to confirm if they wish (I don't recall if this same person was the one who told me about the 2nd person who knows lauda's identity). If they don't, thats fine too.
Have there been any cases where your secret sources fessed up and corroborated your fantasies? Suspending disbelief for a minute and assuming there are actual people who would trust you enough to tell you important "things" in confidence, you seem to be betraying their trust by posting it publicly. Or, it would be even weirder if someone asked you to post it publicly when even a newbie sockpuppet would be more believable.
Either way, I don't care if you believe me or not.
Oh, I have great faith in you. I believe - no, I know for a fact, can you guess how? - that you can be relied upon to make up the most fantastically cringy stories.