Come on man, why are you twisting my words?
I'm not twisted
This person have systematically played faucet funds (our faucet is only 25 sats) during the DDOS attack of our servers
While it's unclear to me as account manager if it affected the LightSpeed bets of this person, which he placed a total of 1810488 bets (In each bet house deducts 1% house fee)
It sounds like your remarks are making a DDOS attack and making money in the meantime.
Regarding the situation nonetheless after analyzing the players statistics we define this players behavior as bonus abuse, and since our automatic system have stopped these withdrawals -- they are cancelled, as the player's account was banned from using game services.
It's really odd how we are being accused of fraud, when the person didn't give us any money, didn't risk anything, and was using systematic faucet abuse during DDOS attack to his advantage.
Again, the decision is based on our anti-abuse algorithms, and we stand by it.
We see this activity as faucet abuse, as the player had a system that he exploited to gain huge benefit.
Does it mean BOT or Tool?
Unfortunately, there is no such system.
Please do not decide for yourself.
Do you think it's okay to make a big profit?
It is not banned on your site.
If you use BOT or a tool that is easy to win, it will be recognized as an abuse, but it is not illegal because you are not using it.
He doesn't go empty handed as he withdrawn $200 with small transactions (as wee see it to bypass abuse detection) and hes behavior is same to faucet abusers that create multiple accounts to abuse the system. Now, it's easy to mask multi-account with various methods, so we can't tell if this is hes only account. Still, we stand by our decision and believe that allegations against us are illegitimate.
There was no minimum withdrawal amount, and I don't think it matters if you divide it into multiple times.
Whether it is being abused or not.
Of course that wasn't the case.
When I exceeded the set balance, I said withdraw.
Unfortunately, it's my only account.
It is a violation for multiple people to log in with one account, and even friends and family cannot teach money-related accounts.
I don't want to have financial troubles.
The account was blocked, as we detected the faucet abuse from said user. We remain right to decline our game services due to fact of bonus abuse without deposit.
It emphasizes "no deposit", but the deposit is not related to the abuse of the bonus.
I think "abuse of bonuses" is enough.
In our understanding, Faucet Abuse is defined by a systematic use of bonuses to get a large advantage over the gambling house. This person have admitted in previous posts in our main thread that he uses other website faucets, hes friends do too, and judging from the faucet and bet logs he had a system. He used the full amount of faucets, pumped the VIP rank by making tens of millions of low risk bets, tried to split hes withdrawal in several smaller withdrawals to bypass our abuse detection system.
We believe that we are on the right side in that conflict, and we have bonus abuse.
"Any attempts of faucet abuse will be subject to an evaluation by the support team." is clearly written in our website documentation.
And that's not the faucet abuse you say.
I don't use it systematically
Some of my friends are making money from the faucet.
If you want to avoid such troubles, I think you should explain it to the website.
In a previous post on the main thread, he said, "Some of my friends are making money."
I'm not saying "I'm making money".
It's the first time I've earned from Faucet.
So I don't think it should be intentional or organized.
While we process small amounts of withdrawals from bonus wins, the $7000 is out of the question. That is our position.
Besides, I said that 7,000 $ is out of the question, but I think the people involved have decided on their own.
It doesn't cheat, doesn't use bots or tools, and doesn't fall under faucet abuse.
Do you still have something?