Now, this is personal: Someone else ripped off one of my posts in a way so blatant that
to see the quotes together is a visual punch in the face. Adding insult to injury, that person is known to dislike me; he has even claimed to have me ignore-listed. It is reasonable to infer that he desired to avoid acknowledging me, simply from spite:
Quote nullius? Never! What nutildah did is exceptionally malicious.
I have never plagiarized from anybody on this forum, let alone you. I find your use of the English language to be atrociously self-absorbed and most of the time you aren't really saying anything other than "PAY ATTENTION TO HOW GREAT I AM!!!!"
The point being expressed in my
post is an independent observation and despite what you personally believe, I'm sure it has occurred to more than one person independently, quite possibly before either of us, and it will again in the future.
I've already explained to you that I don't read your posts. I certainly didn't read your post about NFTs. Only 2 of the 4 things you claim I plagiarized are remotely similar to the points you were making. You claim I used the same checkmarks that you did, I didn't. So that part was an outright lie.
Then you invoked the presumptive findings of a "linguistics expert" to bolster your case, which is a wholly dishonest way to manufacture credibility.
I don't think a single person is fooled by what you are doing here. If they did, they would have commented by now.
Imagine being so self-absorbed and vengeful that you cannot believe someone else had a similar idea as yours but then also have to stoop to manufacture evidence against that person so you can attempt to tarnish their reputation.
This is your fourth post accusing me of plagiarism. Not a single person has agreed with you. Take the hint.
Furthermore, issuing me red trust for plagiarism (or for "defamation" of an inactive forum member for that matter) is incorrect use of the trust system.