Since we have sufficient reasons, why not explain this but ban the member? What did he do wrong?

He start critic thinking which are not accept. In dictatorship
Regimes

Text before 2 years ago: see for yourself

Is there anyone that officially accepts block chain notarized documents as proof of anything?

All that does is prove the document existed in a certain block. In order to be legally binding, I think you would also have to run a time-traceable server that records when blocks were broadcast. The timestamp in the block itself is worthless, since it can't ever be proven to be traceable. And I'm not sure if a legal entity would accept a block explorer's timestamp as binding, either.

I'm not trying to be a dick, I'm just trying to figure out how this all works. These services might have gone away because of these issues

The timestamp in the block itself is worthless, since it can't ever be proven to be traceable.

And DEEPVAULT is no traceble,  it's on begining.
If this technology is soo awsome good, why no partnership?
VIDT have partnership with IBM, Deepvault is top secret that
Even USA goverment cannot copy such secret, 1.april

Did KUCO make mistake and delist coin with the best future in world? I doubt it.