First, I do not care about your truck purchase, spare me the ego trip. And this is certainly not the same thing as taking in BTC investments for a BTC mining group which offers weekly BTC returns.
Again, I'm not talking about "any BTC project, service, or good". I'm talking about a mining organization that took investments with the intent to return weekly distributions of BTC. Thus, a "return on investment" should be measured in BTC.
You’re wrong. It’s ok that you’re wrong. I can see why you want to ignore the Tesla example as it is easier to attack me than Tesla, but you cannot say NastyFams seats have lost value without also claiming Tesla’s sold for BTC have also experienced the same massive loss of value. It’s an idiotic stance to take in real world practice, and it is no different here. I feel like I owe it to people to say that if you try to claim a loss on the purchase of seats while they have gained value then you will likely run into problems with your government and personal finances. It is beyond irresponsible to push the loss of value false narrative for that reason and your incorrect comments could potentially be damaging to those who believe them. It is quite obvious you are in the wrong here and I would like to request you make your own thread to push your false narratives.