I’ve sometimes wondered why the 300 good report threshold must be met in order to gain access to the last 30 day report detail window. At some point I guessed it was a perk that had the threshold as an incentive, but it’s not really common knowledge, so the incentive theory doesn’t quite add-up.
It could also have to do with minimizing strain on retrieving the information (by making it accessible to a reduced amount of people), but it doesn’t look like it would require any heavy lifting to retrieve the information.
Last stats I’ve found on reports from a global point of view are these from mid 2019:
Let it be anonymous, just give us the numbers of those between 1 and 300 reports, those with reports from 300 to 1000, from 1000 to 2000, 2k to 3k, 3k to 5k and above 5k, or something like this.
Counts of members with good reports in the last year:
1-10: 5028
10-25: 399
25-50: 179
50-100: 82
100-200: 90
300-400: 35
400-500: 14
500-750: 20
750-1000: 12
1000-1500: 15
1500-2000: 7
2000-3000: 5
3000-5000: 5
>5000: 8
Thanks to all reporters; we couldn't do it without you!
"In the last year" I presume means using a 1 year rolling window at the time of data retrieval.
I’d have thought that it would be better for everyone to see all their 30 day window reports from the get-go, since it does help to make a self-assessment on how one reports and to get a general idea in what reports are wrong. It also help to make better reports when one follows the outcome (i.e. the board a given post is actually moved to).