Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Similar to the recent subject about when should we start to measure BTC's price because of course, one of the very first transactions to buy two pizzas for 10k bitcoin might not be as representative as prices a few months down the road when larger numbers of trades are allowed and even locations for conducting such trades become more common.. so in that regard, there is a kind of product of the number of transactions and maybe the passage of time, and I do have some troubles gravitating on any price analysis that uses 2010 data because it seems so sporadic.. but it seems by the time that we are getting to 2011, even if the BTC price discovery is relatively immature, it seems fair enough to start to use that data rather than waiting for 2013 or some further down the road date - at least in my thinking.
I'd agree. I think that, barring contrary evidence, that is perfectly fine to consider as the seminal event in the price discovery for Bitcoin. I've always been wary of wanting to throw out data because it doesn't fit a narrative.
When JJG drops baby talk, agreeing becomes easier.
Hahahaha I will take this petition based on an assertion of cause and effect into consideration.... of course, no guarantees... because sometimes certain ways of expressing ideas brings funzies.
By the way, I doubt that either Richy_T or I are disagreeing for the mere sake of it. Not completely sure because I consider some of Richy_T's Bigblocker ideas to be a bit ridiculous and maybe even deserving of some baby talk to ridicule those talking points more, but if Richy_T and I were to be talking about some more narrow point issue that might be more purely just about BTC in terms of how to measure BTC's price performance, then we might end up coming to very similar conclusions - but if we were to go into details and then start talking about the extent to which the altcoin market has affected BTC's price performance, for example, then we might end up getting into combative territories again..
So I have my doubts about whether the employment or non-employment of "baby talk" should be considered as materially and substantively significant in the whole scheme of things, and if some peeps are having trouble identifying some important, substantive and/or material points because they are getting distracted by word choice (or perhaps tone) then they mights be too sensitive to the varying meandering ways of the interwebs, including some proddings that might seem to go overboard from time to time... or maybe even some annoying patterns that might come out (I surely get sick of myself, so I am not too surprised that others might, too).
Chartbuddy is currently under contemplation.
Would be an interesting development... and surely no straight forward thing to keep going... concededly beyond my pay grade..
Yes Richy, come on give us that back. It will be more useful than bigblocking, at least around here. In diz here parts, peeps like the discussening of the actual King Daddy that is, not dee one that could have been. Amirite?
(Back to baby talk for the sake of pluralism - so you can feel free to disagree with me.)
Hey!!!!!!!! U fuck-i-tie-fuck... stop be steawwing dee baby talkenings.
Something is not right about how this is coming out.
