I'm very disappointed by Jorge since a long time. His signature is very misleading! He claims to have an academic interest, but formed his opinion way before he really researched and understood how the network works. There is nothing academic in such an approach. Its okay to have a negative attitude towards bitcoin and being sceptic. But I kind of hoped that he would bring in some reasonable claims inside this circle of enthusiasts.
I've been wondering about that myself a bit. The only reasonable conclusion apart from Jorge trolling is that he is conducting some form of sociological research on the bitcoin community but I somehow doubt it.
I have written several times what is my opinion of bitcoin. Please read it (you may be even more disappointed then).
No, I have no interest in sociological research on the bitcoin community.
And yes, I have a PhD in computer science, that I got by asking stupid questions.