@HCP, ok thank you for your clear explanations.
So here si what I found, history csv file from BRD and electrum don't match, and worst they are not in the same order

I have transactions in BRD that don't correspond when compared with Blockcypher.
Transactions error in BRD file that I noticed:
- 16bZrJtUN6Z8vem25mmYcQsYdNNpK914zv
this address returns many transaction in BRD file from various send adresses. Sometimes, it seems that the wallet has split the amount from the same address. When I try to add up all these little amount from the BRD file, this doesn't match the blockcypher result.
- 1hdcAse8SiFDnoDwAKqNA1CnRMZ6gxrtK
-0.09550433999999999 in BRD and 0,00097 in Blockcypher
- 15mhRUaBCx9M4dnC3RV8kPgEDwKV4xxehE
-0.01391466 in BRD and 1,18839466 in Blockcypher
[/list]
So, i am gonna try to let BRD wallet sync in slow mode and after compare both csv files.
To generate more addresses you can use the command on the Electrum "console" (you might need to use "View -> Show Console" to see the console tab):
Code:
[wallet.create_new_address(False) for i in range(50)]
Every time you type that, it will generate 50 more addresses... you can change 50 to whatever number you like, but you probably don't need to generate more than a few hundred to be relatively sure that the "missing" funds are not hiding past the gap limit.
to be 100% sure you should also try:
Code:
[wallet.create_new_address(True) for i in range(50)]
I tried both code but I didn't notice any change with the history or with the balance. I put in range(300).
Why to use different boolean operators in this code ?
denomination: ok, I had changed it in BTC when i recovered the wallet.
Your help is crucial for me and it's also very interesting to exchange on this topic. Any ideas are welcome.
Mat