This is ridiculous . - On March 23, edited the thread in which you published someone else's material on your behalf
Because I am worried about your mental health.
Da, according to Pravda Ratimova, airfinex is sick с вялотекущей шизофренией. He should be sent to the yellow house for his own good, and to protect others from this contagious mental disease.
In other news: The new Five-Year Plan is ahead of schedule. All Russian people are happy and prosperous. Ratimov did no plagiarism.
I can't be bothered to read the walls of text but I'm sure I can do a pretty good tl;dr:
Lauda posts copy-pasta - not plagiarism because <walls of contrived reasons>.
Person unfavorable to nullius posts something - plagiarism because <walls of completely differently contrived reasons>.
There, I saved you all two hours of reading.
Lauda posts copy-pasta - not plagiarism because <walls of contrived reasons>.
Person unfavorable to nullius posts something - plagiarism because <walls of completely differently contrived reasons>.
There, I saved you all two hours of reading.
Zeroth of all, that is nonsense—in itself, a false accusation by you against my motives. If nutildah’s name is removed from my plagiarism report, it is clear that I would have reported anybody for the same post. What you are saying is, in substantial effect, that I am not allowed to report someone who wrongs me because I have a dispute with him (!).
Furthermore, you compare this:
- My somewhat grudging, qualification-wrapped not-so-much-of-a-defence of a person who promptly admitted wrongdoing, when she was caught with six-year-old copy-pastes and no further evidence of malicious intent. In my judgment, it weighed heavily in her favour that Lauda thanked the anonymous user who reported her, instead of attacking him.Thank you for reporting these.I was about ready to dine on feline fillet; and I grilled Lauda about this in private.
For the record, if Lauda had not so fast and graciously come clean about this, I would have disowned and disavowed her. Whereas in private discussions, she was even angrier at herself than I was at her; and I could not very well condemn her, when she was contemplating whether or not to commit forum seppuku and request a self-ban.🌸🌸🌸🀥🌸🌸🌸
the way of the warrior
if your friend self-eviscerates
beheading is friendship
Base image source: The Gist of Japan: The Islands, Their People, And Missions, Rev. R. B. Peery, A.M., Ph.D. (1897), p. 85,
via Wikimedia Commons.
...to this:
- A user who blatantly ripped off one of my own posts—to whom I reasonably impute a malicious motive of a desire to avoid acknowledging me—who responded to my accusation with a “deny, deny, deny!” strategy, plus profanity-laden personal attacks and playing the victim:
https://archive.is/6tBvd#selection-6085.0-6085.24go fuck yourself nullius
https://archive.is/HSV6y#selection-5209.0-5209.18Stop harassing me.
https://archive.is/HSV6y#selection-6301.0-6301.28have a great day fuckwadius.
[...etc., ad maximam nauseam...]
Perhaps I should have used an anonymous alt to report it? Ah, yes: You would insult and dismiss that as a “fake newbie”.
If I do say so myself, this hereby topic is the very wisest thread that has ever been opened on this forum—nay, on the whole Internet! To uphold that standard, I shall conclude this post with more wise words:
Voluntary goodness is a motive that drives only the best people, and not the average type. Not everyone is of such a personal constitution that he can “be his own authority”. Hence, rules and laws are necessary. Just for instance, the law against stealing: It was not made for those who are honest on principle, but for weak and unstable opportunists. Such rules and laws are meant to hinder the wrongdoer through the deterrent prospect of punishment, and thus to prevent a situation in which the honest man is deemed stupid; that state of affairs would end in the belief that it is better to partake in the robbery than to stand by with empty hands—or worse, to allow oneself to be robbed.