Re: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion
Quote
NASA selects SpaceX as its sole provider for a lunar lander
https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/04/nasa-selects-spacex-as-its-sole-provider-for-a-lunar-lander/
Well it’s Elon, Easa or Russia...
Russia is kind of a bad political idea....
And why are we going back to the moon... we needs to go to Mars
most importantly though China has made moves that looks like it is intending to take the "commanding heights" militarily on the moon, this is no shit serious.
we may see the moon, or lunar orbits, cis lunar orbits, earth-moon L1 Lagrange point or earth orbits become the next battlefield.
1. The moon isn’t a stepping stone to Mars. Going direct to Mars saves time money and resources.
2. The moon is geologically dead and mostly made of the same stuff as earth. If it was pure diamond or gold then I’d understand. I believe He3 to be the most interesting...
....
3. Yup it’s showing their big dick again by putting military presence on the moon 🌚
Well gravity says you are so very wrong.
Along with atmosphere or lack of it.
We could shuttle stuff to the moon
big a bigger boat with more fuel as gravity would allow for easier take off. Also moon would be used as a spinning sling shot to boost that rocket ship.
Finally the lack of or very thin atmosphere would along for less friction on take offs and landing.
So If you really want us to go to mars a large basecamp on the moon makes sense.
As for military on the moon the military has always sucked and will always suck. But Leaders love the war games.