Taking stuff away from successful people to give it to less successful people is called socialism. Just because you can beat someone up and take their money doesn't mean it's a good way to run a society. It's immoral and has never worked in any country that has tried it. It doesn't help the poor people, it just hurts the rich people. Poor people will always be poor because they don't know how to be rich or are just unmotivated.
And what about generational wealth, you cool with putting a tax on "dead" money (when someone uber rich dies)?
Or is successful a term that applies to anyone you are associated with, no matter what they did to generate that success?
There is where nullius starts to write long essays about heirs. This is where nullius starts to refer to himself in the third person. This is where nullius starts to quote himself.
Why do you suppose that, for example, Warren Buffet advocates for the Marxist death tax—whilst he simultaneously assures Berkshire Hathaway shareholders that upon his death, only about 1% of his estate will be liquidated to pay taxes? Oh, yes: The death tax is a weapon of mass destruction against small, family-owned businesses, and also against independent family farms. It is a device to keep BigCorps at the top, and to prevent wealth from accumulating at the bottom and the middle.
This is where nullius really stops following the Wall before it eats all his time again.