Another poster here seems to think decentralization is all good, but that may make reaching consensus more difficult and be a problem.
We already have centralized currencies that are working A LOT better then centralized cryptocurrencies. The existence of a centralized cryptocurrency makes no sense.
Bitcoin Cash is better able to evolve from consensus without that difficulty.
So does PayPal and VISA and ...
Despite Bitcoin Cash's being less decentralized no major security problems have been found to prove it is a problem in the short term.
3 major security flaws:
EDA: difficulty manipulation
Fork at will multiple times to change the protocol without caring what everyone else thinks
Successful 51% attacks to reverse blocks that the centralized controllers of bcash didn't like.
If decentralization is so important why is nobody mentioning Cardano?
This is not a coin comparison topic but Cardano also has a lot of traces of centralization. Starting from its ICO-premine.